Slate Roof vs Tiled Roof — Which Is Better?

The usual way to answer this is a comparison table of cost, weight and lifespan. There is one below, because those things matter.

But there is a more reliable starting point, and it is particularly useful around Chester because the area contains such a wide range of housing — a historic walled centre, Victorian and Edwardian suburbs, inter-war semis and a great deal of modern development. Ask what the house was built for. The structure was framed for the weight of a particular covering and the pitch was set for its characteristics, and going back to that is nearly always the straightforward option.

Older Town-Centre and Georgian Property

Almost certainly slate. Small units, fine courses, and a roof structure framed for a light covering.

• Best answer: natural slate.
• Reasonable alternative: relaying the original slates on new battens and underlay, if they are sound.
• Avoid: concrete tile. Heavier than the structure was designed for, units far too large for the building, and on a period elevation it reads wrong from a long way off.
• Note: inside a conservation area a change of covering is a conversation with the council rather than a free choice.

Victorian and Edwardian Terraces and Semis

Usually slate originally, though a great many have been re-covered in tile since. Around Chester, the Wirral and Deeside that original covering was very often Welsh slate — the Frodsham and Neston conservation area appraisals both record it explicitly.

• Best answer: slate, if the budget allows. It suits the proportions, it is lighter than what may be on there now, and on a street of slate roofs it keeps the terrace reading as one thing.
• Reasonable alternative: fibre cement slate — lighter, cheaper, faster to lay, and much closer to slate in appearance than any tile.
• Workable: clay interlocking tile, where the pitch allows and the street is already mixed.
• Watch: if the roof is currently concrete tile on a structure built for slate, it has been carrying more than it was designed for. Worth a proper look at the timbers during the strip.

Inter-War Semis

The 1920s and 30s stock, and the era with the most genuinely open choice. These roofs were built with either clay tile or slate, and both work.

• Best answer: whichever it was. Clay plain tile and slate both suit the period.
• Good alternative: clay interlocking tile, which holds its colour because the colour is in the clay rather than sprayed onto the surface.
• Pitch check: plain tiles need a notably steeper roof than interlocking tiles or slate. Measure before choosing.
• The hip factor: these roofs are frequently hipped rather than gabled, so whatever you choose there is a great deal of cutting and a lot of hip line. A small-unit covering cuts more neatly around a hip than a large interlocking tile does.

Post-War and Modern Estate Housing

Designed for concrete interlocking tile, and there is usually no reason to fight that.

• Best answer: a modern interlocking tile. The structure was framed for it, the pitch was set for it, and it is the lowest-cost route.
• Worth considering: clay interlocking rather than concrete, if you care whether the roof still looks right in twenty-five years.
• Possible but expensive: slate. Lighter and lower-pitch tolerant, so no technical obstacle — but on a house that never had it, in a street where nothing else does, it is a large amount of money for a result that may look out of place.
• Check the pitch: estate roofs are often at the shallower end, which narrows the tile choice and can rule out plain tiles entirely.

The Comparison, For Completeness

The Three Constraints That Override Preference

Pitch

Every covering has a minimum pitch below which it is not warranted, because below it wind-driven rain is pushed back up under the lap faster than the covering sheds it. Slate tolerates the lowest pitches; plain tiles need the steepest roofs.

Weight

Going lighter is never a structural problem. Going heavier — most commonly slate to concrete tile — means the rafters, purlins and wall plates should be assessed rather than assumed.

Heritage

A like-for-like renewal raises no planning question anywhere. A visible change of covering can, and inside a conservation area the test is applied more tightly. Cheshire West and Chester Council can confirm the position for a specific address.

And the Thing That Actually Decides How Long It Lasts

Worth saying, because people choose on stated lifespan and roofs almost never fail because the covering wore out. They fail at the fixings, the battens, the underlay and the lead.

A well-detailed tiled roof will comfortably outlast a badly detailed slate one. Choose the covering for pitch, weight and period — then spend your attention on the specification underneath it, because that is what decides when you next do this.

The Regulations, in Brief

Two systems, and they are separate. Planning: a like-for-like re-roof does not materially affect the external appearance of a building, so under section 55 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 it is not development at all and needs no permission. A visible change of covering can be a different matter, particularly inside a conservation area.

Building regulations: where more than 50% of the roof's surface area is renewed, or the work forms part of a major renovation, regulation 23 of the Building Regulations 2010 requires the roof to be brought up to current thermal standards so far as that is technically, functionally and economically feasible. A patch repair does not trigger it, and neither does a roof over unheated space such as a detached garage. The work is signed off through building control or by a roofer registered under a competent person scheme, and you should receive a certificate.

More New Roof Guides

All new roof guides →
New Roof Installations Chester →